Your session is about to timeout resulting from inactivity. Click on OK to increase your time and energy for yet another 0 minutes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was creating extra force and was slower compared to outdated stuff. I do not keep in mind if I even tried using standard h4831 or not; I'm imagining not. Click on to broaden...
It's probably that no further discussion is needed, through which circumstance we recommend commencing a new thread. If nonetheless you are feeling your response is needed you may nonetheless accomplish that.
Caution working with SC or SSC formulated loads with lengthy Slice, again off and perform up. Use Harmless loading strategies.
INgunner54 reported: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Identified a node and shot some teams.
Did you ever consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with normal chamber. Pondering What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Hodgdon H4831SC (Brief Cut) extruded rifle propellant is really a top option for huge sport hunters who use handloader rifles. Released while in the 1950s, this propellant has been enhanced with shorter grain sizes which will allow greater powder movement and even more uniformity.
and you may want to invest in some new h4831 vs h4831sc load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does transform over time. 4831 powder of decades in the past isn't really exact same as what's now available. that is definitely why somebody serious about reloading properly will likely have one of the most existing load data books to check with.
dioni.a.312 said: In my knowledge the only actual change is that the shortcut meters superior through reloading products. At the time It really is loaded theres no useful difference. I have read that the shortcut could have a little little bit quicker burn up amount but It appears insignificant. h4831 vs h4831sc Click to increase...
The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they have got slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are far better. It bug the hell outside of me. h4831 vs h4831sc I know greater. This is why I don't ever throw out my more mature manuals. I do order new guide continuously to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ one hundred+ levels with none issues.
So happy your acquiring a lot more types of powder back in. Now you might want to get primers back in inventory and reloaded can start off reloading once more.. just saying
The "SC" stands for Brief Reduce. I have never noticed a distinction between possibly powder dut I don't Feel I'd mix them.
I know the H4831SC gives a better load density But I do think I've adequate space in my case for the traditional H4831.
Needless to say, sitting about for 20+ years (I know a man who remains utilizing the H4831 he purchased inside the 60s), implies that burn prices will most likely improve a smidge, and new manufacture things will probably be marginally distinct as well.